Speaker For The Diodes - Post a comment

Jun. 25th, 2010

05:24 am - QotD

Regarding Joe Barton's apology to BP for the "shakedown" of having to put money in escrow to cover damages from the oil spill:

[info] osewalrus:   

This prompted me to ask -- shouldn't Libertarians be in favor of suing the #$@! out of BP? In Libertarian theory, the fear of such private actions under traditional common law theories of nuisance and strict liability is what replaces regulation as the incentive to behave. Indeed, isn't the problem that the federal government may let BP off too lightly by allowing a captured federal government to abrogate or limit private claims?

[info] agrumer:   

I've noticed that a lot of libertarians favor tort "reform", which also would seem to run contrary to a desire to replace government regulatory power with liability suits.

Or rather, the two ideas run contrary to each other if one's goal is to have a just society in which the criminally irresponsible are held accountable in some way for their crimes.

If, instead, one's goal is the establishment of a pseudo-feudal corporatocracy where the wealthy and powerful can do whatever they wish with no threat of punishment, well, then those two ideas go hand-in-glove.

-- LJ entry and comments, 2010-06-17]

Reply:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous and non-friend posting. You may post here if dglenn lists you as a friend.
(will be screened)
Identity URL: 
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs IP addresses of anonymous posters.