lauramcewan:

Accordingly,in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutionalquestions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the languageof section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union "betweena man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken from thestatute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understoodas making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sexand same-sex couples. In addition, because the limitation of marriageto opposite-sex couples imposed by section 308.5 can have noconstitutionally permissible effect in light of the constitutionalconclusions set forth in this opinion, that provision cannot stand.

YES!!!

---

In other news, I rode my bike today. Up to the park and back. My legs are wobbly. I'm so woefully out of shape. But YAY ME!!!!

Temp is currently 73. Looking for 88 by 5pm. We have a ball game at 6!