http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2015/scotus_roundup/supreme_court_2015_justince_kennedy_s_middle_ground_on_race.html

Marty, I think your observation about the extent to which the King decision is a kind of referendum on Justice Antonin Scalia’s brand of textualism is incredibly insightful. I also find myself wondering if any of you were struck by the tone of the Scalia dissent; it’s getting a lot of attention for the whole “argle bargle 2.0” verbiage (Applesauce! Jiggery Pokery! SCOTUScare!) but is there something else worth saying about it?