Log In
Home - Create Journal - Update - Download
Scribbld - News - Paid Accounts - Invite - To-Do list - Contributors
Customize - Customize - Create Style - Edit Style
Find Users - Random! - By Region - By Interest - Search
Edit ... - User Info - Settings - Your Friends - Old Entries - Userpics - Password
Need Help? - Password? - FAQs - Support Area
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/supreme_court_dispatches/2015/10/supreme_court_justices_argue_over_the_death_penalty_in_kansas_cases.html
Supreme Court justices are rarely on good behavior when they are debating how the government should kill people. As much as they may brag about their collegiality and thick skins, the justices tend to go into beast mode when capital punishment is involved. Antonin Scalia delivers improvised rants from the bench. Clarence Thomas pens mini-biographies of murder victims to justify his biblical sense of revenge. Samuel Alito maligns the lawless “guerrilla war” to block states from obtaining drugs for lethal injection. (Damn that notorious guerrilla warrior, the European Union, for embargoing death drugs.) And the liberals take out their righteous fury on poor state attorneys who just want to get an execution or two under their belt.
(Post a new comment)
scribbld is part of the horse.13 networkDesign by Jimmy B. Logo created by hitsuzen.Scribbld System Status