Agatha Heterodyne (girlgenius) wrote in ttooc,
@ 2010-01-06 08:57:00

N> Permission/Feedback
I've noticed we've been kind of having a slight lull lately. So to spark some interest again, would it be cool if Agatha accidentally released some giant tentacle monster on Traverse Town?

I was thinking that it's only weakness would be broccoli (yes, this does mean shooting/slashing/blowing it up won't work, if anything it'll annoy the beast but if you drop broccoli on it, it shrinks and starts to wiether away) and what it did when it 'got someone' would be to stick them in a rediculous steam punk clown suit that didn't allow for good freedom of movement. Someone with siccsors or a skilled swordsman with a blade could easily cut the person out of the clown suit, it'd just be extremely difficult to remove when you were wearing one. Well an unskilled swordsman could cut someone out too, they'd just be running the risk of cutting the person.

It doesn't have to be my anti-broccoli tentacle monster, it can be something else just as random. I just liked the idea of the monster that doesn't kill people, but does annoy and isn't easily destroyed.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

powerpuff
2010-01-07 04:18 am UTC (link)

Oh why didn't you just say so? You're implying that one person can't just be like *shots it and it dies before anyone gets the chance* right? You could always say the person that actually kills it didn't hear about it till later so people could always make threads saying it took place before the thing was killed.

Your monster suggestions sure are silly. Any monster I'd suggest would want to eat people and cause one bloody mess, which would totally be an issue if we want a lot of people to play with it because it just wouldn't feel right if it couldn't kill at least one of them in all those threads. It'd make it a pathetic monster. And nobody wants to kill their characters and picking one up just to be killed ruins it for anyone who would want to play them at a later time ya know?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

girlgenius
2010-01-07 04:24 am UTC (link)

I'm sorry that "Someone with siccsors or a skilled swordsman with a blade could easily cut the person out of the clown suit, it'd just be extremely difficult to remove when you were wearing one. Well an unskilled swordsman could cut someone out too, they'd just be running the risk of cutting the person." wasn't clear about how people were removed from the suits.... I thought it was......

(I'm not trying to be mean or sarcastic or bad, but I'm really confused as to how that wasn't specific enough and want some help so I can avoid making the same mistake in the future.)

That's kind of what I wanted. Something that didn't like die on its debut day and would do something less fatal. Maybe it'd eat buildings. That'd cause a massive amount of chaos, and it wouldn't kill characters.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

powerpuff
2010-01-07 04:32 am UTC (link)

Ohhh. Whut. Missed that when I read the post. Fail on my part. Sorry. Anyway~

Ne but that'd still be lame for a monster I think I want something fatal. Fatalities are awesome. XD Idk I'm picky with my monsters. I like when they make fire and burn buildings with people actually in them down or eat the people that managed to get out of something they were wrecking ^^;; Haha. I'm terrible.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

girlgenius
2010-01-07 04:35 am UTC (link)

I do play a doctor now that can reattach limbs and stuff. It's not impossible for a monster to get unleashed and have Buzz come in and patch people up. Still, that requires mun's consent and I don't want to make my characters overly powerful or overly important in an event. That's not fair either.

Still the building eating monster thing might be more interesting. I could make it big and accidentally step on people?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

powerpuff
2010-01-07 04:53 am UTC (link)

Can he reattach heads after my monster ripped them off? /hit

See the issue with any monster is you'd need the consent of everyone for it to do anything to someone. Limits, ya know? ...Also I'd be more comfortable if it was a reaaally really big boss heartless instead of a monster made by one specific person. I'm really not liking the idea of Kadaj summoning something because then I'd be responsible for what the monster does. And you'd be responsible for the monster if Agatha did it. Ya know? I never planned to do it but if people want him to.. T_T

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	girlgenius 2010-01-07 04:58 am UTC (link)
	I don't mind that responsibility. I could model it after some boss monster that people can look at on Wiki. I don't mind the notion of a heartless boss but frankly speaking I'm a little bored with killing heartless, as are my characters. Which is why I wanted some other monster. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	powerpuff 2010-01-07 05:17 am UTC (link)
	I'm saying that if it was a heartless then everyone could make it do whatever they wanted with it and they wouldn't have to wait for the person controlling to monster to say the monster did it they could just write it into their own comments. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	girlgenius 2010-01-07 05:20 am UTC (link)
	And there's a reason I can't make an 'everyone runs it' monster OC for the RP? If it's well defined it shouldn't matter where it is from. I will also remind you I know very little about KH cannon so I'm even more uninclined to have a heartless monster running about. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

powerpuff
2010-01-07 05:32 am UTC (link)

Oh it sounded like you wanted to control the monster. Ya you can make one everyone could control. I'd like it if I knew where it was from though. XD Having to read up on something is kind of a pain. Like an instruction manuel for the monster.

I don't wanna ruin it for you but I think having a heartless would make more sense? The place does take place in Kingdom Heart's world so I think a super-big heartless showing up would be totally something that would happen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

embarrassment
2010-01-07 05:38 am UTC (link)

Sorry, but uh, Agatha's a mad scientist and I haven't been really able do to anything really awesome within her cannon that I've been wanting to do ever since I brought her on.

So anything Agatha makes would make sense too, to me anyways. Also, I could make it so that the monster 'evolves' and the players can make it change as we go along. But that's probably complicated....

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

powerpuff
2010-01-07 05:51 am UTC (link)

A lot of people have that problem though with things they want to do with any character. You gotta think of something that's like not too crazy and everyone has to think about but still crazy cool? ..Maaaybe if she invented something and started selling it then it ends up being really-really defective and does something interesting?

XD Well any boss could evolve I don't think that's complicated. I just think people would be more willing to fight with a giant heartless that showed up? Idk. XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

embarrassment
2010-01-07 06:03 am UTC (link)

Funny because its been my experience with all of my characters I can explore all of the awesome aspects of their cannon except Agatha because anything she'd do would be on too large a scale.

And the issue with Agatha building anything in mass is mostly materials, tooling, and personnel. All she's got right now is Sena and he's mostly a gopher as opposed to a contributor to her mad plans. I mean, by now she's had enough time to build something that's truly enormous and defies the laws of nature. But only one of that thing and it'd have some issues I'm sure.

What I really want to do, actually, is have a rogue clank on the loose.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	asklepios 2010-01-07 05:03 am UTC (link)
	Re-reattaching heads!? (Technically yes, but the person's probably dead. Actually, Agatha knows how to reanimate people, so between the two of them we could bring characters back to life.... Holy shit I just realized that.) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	powerpuff 2010-01-07 05:18 am UTC (link)
	That's a little creepy. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	girlgenius 2010-01-07 05:22 am UTC (link)
	Yes yes it is. But the likely hood of me using that is almost niltch. Buzz wouldn't ICly try to reattach someone's head unless he was certain it'd save their lives. And I could argue that Agatha doesn't currently have the equipment to revive someone as easily as I could argue she now does. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	powerpuff 2010-01-07 05:34 am UTC (link)
	Mmmhm~ I think that's good to know though incase we ever really really really wanted to have a death. But we can't overuse something like that. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	embarrassment 2010-01-07 05:40 am UTC (link)
	Exactly. This is also a recent development too. Agatha doesn't have medical knowledge, but she does know about reanimation very well. Buzz has the medical knowledge and then some, but nothing on reanimation. And they haven't met yet, so as of right now, unless the person's intact with all functional organs, Agatha couldn't do any reviving. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status