Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

Scribbld
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Invite
    - To-Do list
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - User Info
    - Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Userpics
    - Password

Need Help?
    - Password?
    - FAQs
    - Support Area

clickanon (clickanon) wrote,
@ 2011-06-08 21:17:00

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2011-06-09 03:03 pm UTC (link)
	in most cases i find it unrealistic to age singers down, but in katy's case i think it's okay tbh. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-06-09 03:05 pm UTC (link)
	i mean i only ask bc i know there are a few musical roles that are taken by people drastically under the singer's age or along those lines and they are so loved and well written characters, but i was jw if it'd be okay since i don't think she sings about too many over the top things, and i feel like she somewhat sings about things that are... younger.. than her? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-06-09 03:07 pm UTC (link)
	no, ia with you! i think to age katy's credits down by 4 years would be fine since you're right, her stuff is fairly inoffensive. are you going to keep her christian albums too? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-06-09 03:12 pm UTC (link)
	no, i don't think so. i'm just going to use her mainstream stuff aka her last two pop albums, not her other one since i don't really think it'd be age appropriately released or really mix well with her background. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status