clickanon (clickanon) wrote,
@ 2011-07-13 10:33:00

this is your REGULAR anon post.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:43 am UTC (link)
	i kinda think it's rude to mention it/link to it in the comm...even if it's ooc. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:44 am UTC (link)
	i agree. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:45 am UTC (link)
	that's kind of ridiculous... it's not like it's some great secret we're keeping (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:46 am UTC (link)
	i never said that but some people choose not to come in here/acknowledge it. bringing it to ij is basically rubbing it in their faces. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:47 am UTC (link)
	if they choose not to acknowledge it, they can also choose not to acknowledge the post mentioning it? the fact is it does exist and there's a fair number of us who use it, so it's a little unrealistic to think it's never going to be mentioned ever (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:48 am UTC (link)
	idk i kind of think it's crossing a line but we can agree to disagree (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:50 am UTC (link)
	it's absolutely crossing a line. and it's unnecessary. there are people who are bothered by the fact that we have an anon comm and choose to ignore it, there's no reason to keep reminding them of it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:52 am UTC (link)
	i completely agree, anon. i mean i obviously don't care but there are some people who do. i just think that everything in this journal should stay here but i guess that's the unpopular opinion? (Reply to this)(Parent)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 12:53 am UTC (link)
	since it bothers you so much, i'll remove the reference to anon. sorry to have ruffled any feathers, anon. i honestly didn't know it was a problem or that people were upset by this journal, because 95% of the time it's positive and fun; i personally don't lump it together with the rest of the anon journals. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:55 am UTC (link)
	ty! i didn't mean to single you out but i just didn't agree with mentioning it in the ooc comm. i do love all of your characters, though. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 01:03 am UTC (link)
	right. well, i changed the post. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 01:19 am UTC (link)
	....wow you didn't have to be rude about it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

caddyshack
2011-07-15 01:28 am UTC (link)

i wasn't rude at all. i apologized, and i changed the post. i think it was pretty rude to start bashing the post in here, tbh. i could've told you and your fellow anons to go screw yourselves and etc, etc. but i didn't. i really don't know why i should jump for joy that people came in here and called me rude and talked about how awkward it made them feel, etc. it made me feel bad, and that's shitty. nothing written in a positive only anon journal should make anyone feel bad, but let's be real: people posted about it here specifically to single me out and make me feel bad. otherwise, it could've been brought up privately. i've got anon turned on in my ic journal, if someone wanted to say something about it there, they could have. but it was brought up here, publicly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 01:32 am UTC (link)
	okay, i'm sorry that your feelings were hurt. i actually didn't start the thread but i did agree with the op. next time if i have a problem with something you do i'll use your drop-box. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 01:36 am UTC (link)
	i'd honestly appreciate that. like.. idk, it seems people forget that the people behind these characters are still people, who have feelings, and etc, etc. it bothers me how everything gets turned into a negative in this journal, it sucks the fun out of things. if i seemed snappy in my reply, i apologize. i wasn't trying to be rude, it's just frustrating. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 01:39 am UTC (link)
	no need to apologize! i really shouldn't have said something to begin with. it's better to let one negative comment sit there than contribute to it. i'm sorry that i contributed and next time i'll refrain from doing it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 01:40 am UTC (link)
	it's ok. thank you, though, nonny. and i do appreciate the compliment you gave me, too <3 truce? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 01:42 am UTC (link)
	<3 truce! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 01:43 am UTC (link)
	:) (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2011-07-15 12:57 am UTC (link)
	but there's the 5 percent of the time that's enough to bother some people not to want to acknowledge the journal, so why force them to? that was a needless reference, anyhow. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	caddyshack 2011-07-15 01:02 am UTC (link)
	as i said, i didn't realize it would piss people off, and i removed the reference, so i don't see how it's still an issue. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status