Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

Scribbld
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Invite
    - To-Do list
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - User Info
    - Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Userpics
    - Password

Need Help?
    - Password?
    - FAQs
    - Support Area


je veux te voir dans un film pornographique ([info]ludivine) wrote in [info]sephiroth,
Personally, I think the second one is unsalvageable--you could make it useable by screening + sharpening the shit out of it, but both the lighting and quality are so bad I don't think it's possible to manage to make it pretty. As for #1, the contrast and saturation are low, so taking the standard screen + soft light formula everyone knows, I'd just duplicate the soft light layer once or twice extra, and possibly duplicate the screen if it gets too dark after that.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous and non-friend posting. You may post here if sephiroth lists you as a friend.
Identity URL: 
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 



scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status