sorters anons (sortersanons) wrote,
@ 2012-02-20 20:30:00

anon is currently: on. no funny business!

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

(Anonymous)
2012-02-26 12:08 am UTC (link)

I HAVE AN IDEA BUT I DON'T HAVE TIME TO WRITE IT OUT RN SO IF ANYONE LIKES IT FEEL FREE TO RUN WITH IT? since we couldn't come to an agreement or reason why everyone would be outside, what if someone starts a group thread where a npc is outside (not the one who did it, an innocent bystander wrong place wrong time sort of situation) who does see it and then runs into the castle and starts telling people and it spreads to everyone so everyone can start panicking and accusing?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:09 am UTC (link)
	i like this idea (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:10 am UTC (link)
	i figure it would prevent people from not being included since their characters wouldn't sneak out or wouldn't be interested in whatever everyone was outside for etc (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:11 am UTC (link)
	i'm new so i feel awkward including my opinion since i wasn't around for previous discussions but i dw this it sounds fun (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:11 am UTC (link)
	OH THAT WOULD BE LOVELY and then there could be "inside" threads where people are accusing and "outside" threads were people are running around like hot messes (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:13 am UTC (link)
	we're past that mindframe though imo (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:14 am UTC (link)
	you wouldn't have to write it anon, it'd be for the people who dw to thread the panic (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:15 am UTC (link)
	but that's excluding people and others have already talked about how they found out kanyeshrug (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:15 am UTC (link)
	that's not our problem no offense (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:16 am UTC (link)
	no offense it kind of is when you want an active group thread (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:16 am UTC (link)
	don't you think it's better to have a thread most/some people could participate in rather having no thread at all? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:17 am UTC (link)
	no because it would be better to have a thread everyone could participate in (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:18 am UTC (link)
	i don't see you making any brilliant suggestions (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:19 am UTC (link)
	and you won't see them when people are being cunts jfc (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:21 am UTC (link)
	i'm sorry you feel that way but you're going to get cunts by leaving a comment that is clearly negative and not constructive in any way at all (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:23 am UTC (link)
	how is it not constructive to say we should do something everyone can do? you anons get defensive over everything if it isn't screaming unicorns (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:17 am UTC (link)
	so it's better for everyone to miss out? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:17 am UTC (link)
	it's better to make something everyone could do? (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:14 am UTC (link)
	WE HAVE TO GO BACK i think we could do it tbh (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-26 12:16 am UTC (link)
	that would be good! (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status