Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

Scribbld
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Invite
    - To-Do list
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - User Info
    - Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Userpics
    - Password

Need Help?
    - Password?
    - FAQs
    - Support Area

sorters anons (sortersanons) wrote,
@ 2012-02-26 21:36:00

anon is on but i am not in the mood for any funny business

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:15 pm UTC (link)
	you flawless being. i knew we'd have to figure out a way to make sure everyone got their turn while not dragging or risking losing interest i just didn't know how now i do (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:17 pm UTC (link)
	oh you (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:21 pm UTC (link)
	i get that a lot and then when we do the NAME HERE - REPLY NAME HERE- REPLY etc etc, have one jury member from that group start that particular thread yes? no? makes sense? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:22 pm UTC (link)
	i take it back BUT YES and then the accused could reply and state their case and whoever is representing them could jump in as well (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:23 pm UTC (link)
	wonderful thank yoou (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2012-02-28 10:22 pm UTC (link)
	MEANING like jury #1 starts for accused #1, jury #2 for accused #2 ETC (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status